Royal Bead Novelty Co. v. United States
32 Cust. Ct. 431, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1911
United States Customs Court·Decided March 18, 1954·No. No. 57931; protest 158260-K (New York)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the articles in question consist of enamel pin trays the same in all material respects as the merchandise involved in Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc. v. United States (28 Cust. Ct. 280, C. D. 1423) and Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc. v. United States (9 Cust. Ct. 342, C. D. 710), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Royal Bead Novelty Co. v. United States, 32 Cust. Ct. 431, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1911 (cusc 1954).
32 Cust. Ct. 431 (Royal Bead Novelty Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ignaz Strauss & Co. v. United States
9 Cust. Ct. 342 (U.S. Customs Court, 1942)
Ignaz Strauss & Co. v. United States
28 Cust. Ct. 280 (U.S. Customs Court, 1952)