Royal Baking Co. v. Samergedes

Supreme Court of Florida

Royal Baking Co. v. Samergedes

170 So. 2d 842

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided September 9, 1964·No. No. 33491·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida [843] Industrial Commission bearing date April 28, 1964.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ-, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida [843] Industrial Commission bearing date April 28, 1964.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ-, concur.

Royal Baking Co. v. Samergedes, 170 So. 2d 842 (Fla. 1964).

Pincite

170 So. 2d 842 (Royal Baking Co. v. Samergedes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related