Royal Baking Co. v. Samergedes

Supreme Court of Florida

Royal Baking Co. v. Samergedes

170 So. 2d 842

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedSeptember 9, 1964

DocketNo. 33491

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 170 So. 2d 842 (Royal Baking Co. v. Samergedes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Royal Baking Co. v. Samergedes, 170 So. 2d 842 (Fla. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida [843]*843Industrial Commission bearing date April 28, 1964.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ-, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI