Royal Arcanum v. Lester

Supreme Court of Georgia

Royal Arcanum v. Lester

190 S.E. 562, 184 Ga. 51, 1937 Ga. LEXIS 452

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedMarch 10, 1937

DocketNo. 11629

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 190 S.E. 562 (Royal Arcanum v. Lester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Royal Arcanum v. Lester, 190 S.E. 562, 184 Ga. 51, 1937 Ga. LEXIS 452 (Ga. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Atkinson, Justice.

Under the petition as amended, the suit is an action at law for recovery of money as damages as for a breach of contract, without any allegation atad prayer for equitable relief. The case is one in which, under the constitution, the Supreme Court has not jurisdiction of the bill of exceptions; and therefore it is

Transferred to Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur. J. A. McFarland, Bryan, Middlebroolcs \& Garter, Bonneau Ansley, and Garitón McGamy, for plaintiff in error. Mitchell & Mitchell, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atkinson, Justice.

Under the petition as amended, the suit is an action at law for recovery of money as damages as for a breach of contract, without any allegation atad prayer for equitable relief. The case is one in which, under the constitution, the Supreme Court has not jurisdiction of the bill of exceptions; and therefore it is

Transferred to Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur. J. A. McFarland, Bryan, Middlebroolcs \& Garter, Bonneau Ansley, and Garitón McGamy, for plaintiff in error. Mitchell & Mitchell, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

190 S.E. 562, 184 Ga. 51, 1937 Ga. LEXIS 452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/royal-arcanum-v-lester-ga-1937.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack