Royal Alexander v. Brett Cassidy
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
April 1, 2013 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman 146389 Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano, ROYAL ALEXANDER, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee, v SC: 146389 COA: 301860 Genesee CC: 09-092311-CZ BRETT CASSIDY, ROBERT FROST, and BLAKE HIBEN, Defendants-Appellants, and NATE GUIGER, Defendant. _________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 29, 2012 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. April 1, 2013 _________________________________________ d0325 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Royal Alexander v. Brett Cassidy (Royal Alexander v. Brett Cassidy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.