Roy Y. Sanders, Jr. v. David L. Ladd, Commissioner of Patents

D.C. Circuit

Roy Y. Sanders, Jr. v. David L. Ladd, Commissioner of Patents

294 F.2d 231, 111 U.S. App. D.C. 35, 130 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 48, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4058

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedJune 29, 1961

Docket16225

StatusPublished

This text of 294 F.2d 231 (Roy Y. Sanders, Jr. v. David L. Ladd, Commissioner of Patents) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roy Y. Sanders, Jr. v. David L. Ladd, Commissioner of Patents, 294 F.2d 231, 111 U.S. App. D.C. 35, 130 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 48, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4058 (D.C. Cir. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a patent case, under 35 U.S.C. § 145. Plaintiff-appellant’s application, Serial No. 333,147, covered a marked pharmaceutical tablet and the process of marking such a tablet. Though the plaintiff seems to have met a business need, and his process has achieved financial success, we are not convinced that the Patent Office and the District Court were wrong in holding that the application did not disclose patentable invention over the prior art. See Schafer v. Watson, 1961, 109 U.S.App.D.C. 360, 288 F.2d 144.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is a patent case, under 35 U.S.C. § 145. Plaintiff-appellant’s application, Serial No. 333,147, covered a marked pharmaceutical tablet and the process of marking such a tablet. Though the plaintiff seems to have met a business need, and his process has achieved financial success, we are not convinced that the Patent Office and the District Court were wrong in holding that the application did not disclose patentable invention over the prior art. See Schafer v. Watson, 1961, 109 U.S.App.D.C. 360, 288 F.2d 144.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

294 F.2d 231, 111 U.S. App. D.C. 35, 130 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 48, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4058, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roy-y-sanders-jr-v-david-l-ladd-commissioner-of-patents-cadc-1961.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack