ROY W. BRUCE v. U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOC., AS TRUSTEE
This text of 241 So. 3d 221 (ROY W. BRUCE v. U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOC., AS TRUSTEE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
ROY W. BRUCE, JR., and ALICE BRUCE, ) ) Appellants, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-531 ) U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ) as Trustee, successor by merger to ) LaSalle Bank, National Association ) Trustee for Washington Mutual Asset- ) Backed Certificates WMABS Series ) 2006-HE3 T, ) ) Appellee. ) )
Opinion filed February 14, 2018.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Donald G. Jacobsen, Judge.
Roy W. Bruce, Jr., and Alice Bruce, pro se.
Allison Morat and Teris A. McGovern of Pearson Bitman LLP, Maitland, for Appellee.
SLEET, Judge.
Roy W. Bruce, Jr., and Alice Bruce challenge the trial court's nonfinal
order denying Mr. Bruce's motion to quash service against him individually in the
foreclosure action brought by U.S. Bank National Association against the Bruces
individually and in their capacities as trustees of the Roy W. Bruce, Jr., and Alice M. Bruce Revocable Living Trust dated December 2011. We affirm the trial court's order
as to Mr. Bruce without further comment. We dismiss this appeal as to Mrs. Bruce
because the order on appeal denied a motion brought only by Mr. Bruce. Thus the
order did not affect her, and she does not have standing to challenge it on appeal. See
generally Hayes v. Guardianship of Thompson, 952 So. 2d 498, 505 (Fla. 2006)
("Standing is a legal concept that requires a would-be litigant to demonstrate that he or
she reasonably expects to be affected by the outcome of the proceedings, either directly
or indirectly."); cf. Ghali v. Smith, 575 So. 2d 1386, 1386 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)
("[Appellant] lacks the requisite standing to appeal the denial of a nonparty's motion to
quash substitute service of process.").
Affirmed in part; dismissed in part.
KELLY and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
241 So. 3d 221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roy-w-bruce-v-u-s-bank-national-assoc-as-trustee-fladistctapp-2018.