ROY W. BRUCE v. U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOC., AS TRUSTEE

241 So. 3d 221
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 14, 2018
Docket17-0531
StatusPublished

This text of 241 So. 3d 221 (ROY W. BRUCE v. U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOC., AS TRUSTEE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
ROY W. BRUCE v. U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOC., AS TRUSTEE, 241 So. 3d 221 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

ROY W. BRUCE, JR., and ALICE BRUCE, ) ) Appellants, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-531 ) U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ) as Trustee, successor by merger to ) LaSalle Bank, National Association ) Trustee for Washington Mutual Asset- ) Backed Certificates WMABS Series ) 2006-HE3 T, ) ) Appellee. ) )

Opinion filed February 14, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Donald G. Jacobsen, Judge.

Roy W. Bruce, Jr., and Alice Bruce, pro se.

Allison Morat and Teris A. McGovern of Pearson Bitman LLP, Maitland, for Appellee.

SLEET, Judge.

Roy W. Bruce, Jr., and Alice Bruce challenge the trial court's nonfinal

order denying Mr. Bruce's motion to quash service against him individually in the

foreclosure action brought by U.S. Bank National Association against the Bruces

individually and in their capacities as trustees of the Roy W. Bruce, Jr., and Alice M. Bruce Revocable Living Trust dated December 2011. We affirm the trial court's order

as to Mr. Bruce without further comment. We dismiss this appeal as to Mrs. Bruce

because the order on appeal denied a motion brought only by Mr. Bruce. Thus the

order did not affect her, and she does not have standing to challenge it on appeal. See

generally Hayes v. Guardianship of Thompson, 952 So. 2d 498, 505 (Fla. 2006)

("Standing is a legal concept that requires a would-be litigant to demonstrate that he or

she reasonably expects to be affected by the outcome of the proceedings, either directly

or indirectly."); cf. Ghali v. Smith, 575 So. 2d 1386, 1386 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)

("[Appellant] lacks the requisite standing to appeal the denial of a nonparty's motion to

quash substitute service of process.").

Affirmed in part; dismissed in part.

KELLY and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hayes v. Guardianship of Thompson
952 So. 2d 498 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2006)
Ghali v. Smith
575 So. 2d 1386 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
241 So. 3d 221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roy-w-bruce-v-u-s-bank-national-assoc-as-trustee-fladistctapp-2018.