Roy Vaughn and Zelma Vaughn v. W. T. Coppinger, District Director of Internal Revenue for Birmingham, Alabama, Emma Lou Johnson v. W. T. Coppinger, District Director of Internal Revenue for Birmingham, Alabama, Nos. 71-1303, 71-1306 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York, 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I

443 F.2d 71
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJune 15, 1971
Docket71
StatusPublished

This text of 443 F.2d 71 (Roy Vaughn and Zelma Vaughn v. W. T. Coppinger, District Director of Internal Revenue for Birmingham, Alabama, Emma Lou Johnson v. W. T. Coppinger, District Director of Internal Revenue for Birmingham, Alabama, Nos. 71-1303, 71-1306 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York, 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roy Vaughn and Zelma Vaughn v. W. T. Coppinger, District Director of Internal Revenue for Birmingham, Alabama, Emma Lou Johnson v. W. T. Coppinger, District Director of Internal Revenue for Birmingham, Alabama, Nos. 71-1303, 71-1306 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York, 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I, 443 F.2d 71 (5th Cir. 1971).

Opinion

443 F.2d 71

71-2 USTC P 9564

Roy VAUGHN and Zelma Vaughn, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
W. T. COPPINGER, District Director of Internal Revenue for
Birmingham, Alabama, Defendant-Appellee.
Emma Lou JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
W. T. COPPINGER, District Director of Internal Revenue for
Birmingham, Alabama, Defendant-Appellee.
Nos. 71-1303, 71-1306 Summary Calendar.*
*Rule 18, 5 Cir.; See Isbell Enterprises, Inc.
v.
Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970,
431 F.2d 409, Part I.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 15, 1971.

J. Louis Wilkinson, Charles Crowder, Parker, Wilkinson & Montgomery, P.A., Wilder, Crowder, & Hampe, Birmingham, Ala., for appellants.

Wayman G. Sherrer, U.S. Atty., Birmingham, Ala., Johnnie M. Walters, Asst. Atty. Gen., Meyer Rothwacks, Crombie J. D. Garrett, William S. Estabrook, III, Attys., Tax Div. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Fred B. Ugast, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama; Sam C. Pointer, Jr., Judge.

Before WISDOM, COLEMAN and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed.1 See Local Rule 21.2

1

The decision of the district court is reported, Johnson v. Coppinger, N.D.Ala. 1971, 320 F.Supp. 716. The district court entered a memorandum order in No. 71-1303, Vaughn, adopting and incorporating its decision in No. 71-1306, Johnson. The issues in the two cases are conceded by the parties to be identical

nf2

See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing

2

See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing F.2d 966

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
443 F.2d 71, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roy-vaughn-and-zelma-vaughn-v-w-t-coppinger-district-director-of-ca5-1971.