Roy v. United Benefit Life Insurance
314 So. 2d 817, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13639
Opinion
As to appellant’s contention in this court that foreign law applies to this case, see [818]*818Fla.Stat. § 92.031, and Movielab, Inc. v. Davis, Fla.App.1969, 217 So.2d 890.
Further, as to applicable Florida law, see Rosin v. Peninsular Life Insurance Company, Fla.App.1960, 116 So.2d 798, which we hold governing under the facts pleaded in this complaint.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Roy v. United Benefit Life Insurance, 314 So. 2d 817, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13639 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).
314 So. 2d 817 (Roy v. United Benefit Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Movielab, Inc. v. Davis
217 So. 2d 890 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
Rosin v. Peninsular Life Insurance Company
116 So. 2d 798 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)