Roy v. State

75 S.W.2d 886

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Roy v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 120 Tex. Crim. 247 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 7, 1934·No. No. 17064·Published

Opinion

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is selling a spirituous liquor capable of producing intoxication; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is selling a spirituous liquor capable of producing intoxication; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Roy v. State, 75 S.W.2d 886 (Tex. 1934).

Pincite

75 S.W.2d 886 (Roy v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.