Roy v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided December 9, 2021·No. 17-323·Unpublished

Opinion

Sn the Guited States Court of Federal Clanns

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 17-323V Filed: November 23, 2021

* * OO * OO * OO * OO * OO * OO JAMES J. ROY and MARY ANN * UNPUBLISHED BOGER, as Administrators and Legal * Representatives of the Estate of * PAULE. ROY, *

*

Petitioner, ** Decision on Joint Stipulation; * Cellulitis; Influenza (“flu”) Vv. * Vaccine.

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

*

Respondent. ** * * OO * OO * OO * OO * OO * OO

Ramon Rodriguez III, Esq., Sands Anderson PC, Richmond, VA, for petitioner. Adriana Teitel, Esq., US Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION!

Roth, Special Master:

On March 9, 2017, James J. Roy and Mary Ann Boger [“Mr. Roy and Ms. Boger” or “petitioners” | filed a petition on behalf of the estate of their father, Paul E. Roy, for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.’ Petitioners allege that he developed

! Although this Decision has been formally designated “unpublished,” it will nevertheless be posted on the Court of Federal Claims’s website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107- 347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. However, the parties may object to the Decision’s inclusion of certain kinds of confidential information. Specifically, under Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has fourteen days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the whole Decision will be available to the public. /d.

* National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).

cellulitis after receiving an influenza (“flu”) vaccine on October 2, 2014, and that his death on March 9, 2015 was the sequela of his alleged vaccine-related injury. Stipulation, filed November 23, 2021, at {fl 1-4. Respondent denies that the flu vaccine caused his alleged cellulitis, any other injury, or his death. Stipulation at { 6.

Nevertheless, the parties have agreed to settle the case. On November 23, 2021, the parties filed a joint stipulation agreeing to settle this case and describing the settle ment terms.

Respondent agrees to issue the following payment:

A lump sum of $50,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioners as administrators and legal representatives of the Estate of Paul E. Roy. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 300aa-15(a).

I adopt the parties’ stipulation attached hereto, and award compensation in the amount and on the terms set forth therein. The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.?

IT ISSO ORDERED.

s/ Mindy Michaels Roth Mindy Michaels Roth Special Master

* Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

JAMES J. ROY and MARY ANN BOGER, as administrators and legal representatives of Estate of Paul E. Roy,

Petitioners, No. 17-323V Special Master Roth v. ECF

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

STIPULATION The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

1. James J. Roy and Mary Ann Boger (“petitioners”), as administrators and legal representatives of the Estate of Paul E. Roy (“Mr. Roy”), deceased, filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 to 34 (the “Vaccine Program”). The petition seeks compensation for injuries and death allegedly related to Mr. Roy’s receipt of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine, which vaccine is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3(a).

2. Mr. Roy received a flu vaccine and Pneumovax vaccine! on October 2, 2014.

3, The vaccines were administered within the United States.

4. Petitioners allege that as a result of receiving the flu vaccine, Mr. Roy suffered cellulitis. Mr. Roy passed away on March 9, 2015. Petitioners further allege that Mr. Roy’s

death was the sequela of his alleged vaccine-related injury.

' Pneumovax, a pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine, is not contained in the vaccine injury Table.

1 of 5 5. Petitioners represent that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages on behalf of Mr. Roy as a result of his alleged injury or his death.

6. Respondent denies that the flu vaccine caused Mr. Roy’s alleged cellulitis, any other injury, or his death.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioners have filed an election to receive compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue the following vaccine compensation payment:

A lump sum of $50,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioners as administrators and legal representatives of Estate of Paul E. Roy. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

9. As soon as practicable after the entry of judgment on entitlement in this case, and after petitioners have filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings before the special master to award reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in proceeding upon this petition.

10. Petitioners and their attorney represent that they have identified to respondent all known sources of payment for items or services for which the Program is not primarily liable under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g), including State compensation programs, insurance policies,

Federal or State health benefits programs (other than Title XIX of the Social Security Act (42

U.S.C. § 1396 et seq.)), or entities that provide health services on a pre-paid basis.

2 of 5 11. Payment made pursuant to paragraph 8 and any amounts awarded pursuant to paragraph 9 of this Stipulation will be made in accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(i), subject to the availability of sufficient statutory funds.

12. Petitioners represent that they presently are, or within 90 days of the date of judgment will become, duly authorized to serve as the Administrators and Legal Representatives of the Estate of Paul E. Roy under the laws of the State of Indiana. No payments pursuant to this Stipulation shall be made until petitioners provide the Secretary with documentation establishing their appointment as the Administrators and Legal Representatives of the Estate of Paul E. Roy. If petitioners are not authorized by a court of competent jurisdiction to serve as the Legal Representatives of the Estate of Paul E. Roy at the time a payment pursuant to this Stipulation is to be made, any such payment shall be paid to the party or parties appointed by a court of competent jurisdiction to serve as Legal Representative of the Estate of Paul E. Roy upon submission of written documentation of such appointment to the Secretary.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roy v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2021).

Roy v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Roy v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
§ 300aa-21
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a