Roy v. Ross

105 So. 922, 213 Ala. 702
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided October 15, 1925·No. 3 Div. 684.·Published

Opinion

SOMERVILLE, J.

The question involved is one of fact. We agree with the findings of the trial court. The decree is affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roy v. Ross, 105 So. 922, 213 Ala. 702 (Ala. 1925).

105 So. 922 (Roy v. Ross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.