ROY v. CALIFORNIA Et Al.

Supreme Court

ROY v. CALIFORNIA Et Al.

386 U.S. 279, 87 S. Ct. 1037, 18 L. Ed. 2d 47, 1967 U.S. LEXIS 2054

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMarch 13, 1967

Docket68, Misc

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 386 U.S. 279 (ROY v. CALIFORNIA Et Al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

ROY v. CALIFORNIA Et Al., 386 U.S. 279, 87 S. Ct. 1037, 18 L. Ed. 2d 47, 1967 U.S. LEXIS 2054 (1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and' the .case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. California, ante, p. 18.

Mr. Justice Stewart would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result in Chapman v. California, ante, at 42.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and' the .case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. California, ante, p. 18.

Mr. Justice Stewart would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result in Chapman v. California, ante, at 42.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

386 U.S. 279, 87 S. Ct. 1037, 18 L. Ed. 2d 47, 1967 U.S. LEXIS 2054, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roy-v-california-et-al-scotus-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack