ROY v. CALIFORNIA Et Al.

Supreme Court

ROY v. CALIFORNIA Et Al.

386 U.S. 279, 87 S. Ct. 1037, 18 L. Ed. 2d 47, 1967 U.S. LEXIS 2054

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 13, 1967·No. 68, Misc·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and' the .case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. California, ante, p. 18.

Mr. Justice Stewart would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result in Chapman v. California, ante, at 42.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and' the .case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. California, ante, p. 18.

Mr. Justice Stewart would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result in Chapman v. California, ante, at 42.

ROY v. CALIFORNIA Et Al., 386 U.S. 279, 87 S. Ct. 1037, 18 L. Ed. 2d 47, 1967 U.S. LEXIS 2054 (1967).

Pincite

386 U.S. 279 (ROY v. CALIFORNIA Et Al.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related