Roy v. Astrue

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided October 1, 2014·No. Civil Action No. 2013-1080·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

)

ISAIAH KENNETH ROY, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 13-1080 (ABJ)

)

MICHAEL ASTRUE, ) Commissioner of the Social Security ) Administration, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

ORDER

On September 8, 2014, Magistrate Judge Alan Kay issued a Report and Recommendation

[Dkt. # 12] with respect to plaintiff’s motion for a judgment of reversal [Dkt. # 9], and

defendant’s motion for a judgment of affirmance [Dkt. # 10]. Magistrate Judge Kay

recommends that plaintiff’s motion be denied, and that defendant’s motion be granted. Sept. 8,

2014 Report & Recommendation at 24. The report advised the parties “that under the provisions

of Local Rule 72.3(b) of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, any party

who objects to the Report and Recommendation must file a written objection thereto with the

Clerk of this Court within 14 days of the party’s receipt of this Report and Recommendation.”

Id. To date, no objections have been filed.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [Dkt. # 12] is

ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for a judgment of reversal [Dkt. # 9] is

DENIED; and it is

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roy v. Astrue, (D.D.C. 2014).

Roy v. Astrue (Roy v. Astrue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.