Roy v. Astrue
This text of Roy v. Astrue (Roy v. Astrue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) ISAIAH KENNETH ROY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 13-1080 (ABJ) ) MICHAEL ASTRUE, ) Commissioner of the Social Security ) Administration, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________)
ORDER
On September 8, 2014, Magistrate Judge Alan Kay issued a Report and Recommendation
[Dkt. # 12] with respect to plaintiff’s motion for a judgment of reversal [Dkt. # 9], and
defendant’s motion for a judgment of affirmance [Dkt. # 10]. Magistrate Judge Kay
recommends that plaintiff’s motion be denied, and that defendant’s motion be granted. Sept. 8,
2014 Report & Recommendation at 24. The report advised the parties “that under the provisions
of Local Rule 72.3(b) of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, any party
who objects to the Report and Recommendation must file a written objection thereto with the
Clerk of this Court within 14 days of the party’s receipt of this Report and Recommendation.”
Id. To date, no objections have been filed.
It is therefore ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [Dkt. # 12] is
ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for a judgment of reversal [Dkt. # 9] is
DENIED; and it is
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Roy v. Astrue, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roy-v-astrue-dcd-2014.