Roy & Titcomb, Inc. v. United States
71 Ct. Cl. 787, 69 Ct. Cl. 614
Opinion
Judgment was rendered in favor of the United States in the court below. Upon certiorari the judgment was affirmed January 26, 1931, per curiam, on the authority of Stange v. United States, 282 U. S. 270; Aiken v. Burnet, 282 U. S. 277; Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. Burnet, 282 U. S. 283; Burnet v. Chicago Ry. Equipment Co., 282 U. S. 295; Graham v. Goodcell, 282 U. S. 409; Mascot Oil Co. v. United States, 282 U. S. 434.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Roy & Titcomb, Inc. v. United States, 71 Ct. Cl. 787, 69 Ct. Cl. 614 (cc 1931).
71 Ct. Cl. 787 (Roy & Titcomb, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stange v. United States
282 U.S. 270 (Supreme Court, 1931)
Aiken v. Burnet
282 U.S. 277 (Supreme Court, 1931)
W. P. Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. Burnet
282 U.S. 283 (Supreme Court, 1931)
Burnet v. Chicago Railway Equipment Co.
282 U.S. 295 (Supreme Court, 1931)
Graham & Foster v. Goodcell
282 U.S. 409 (Supreme Court, 1931)
Mascot Oil Co. v. United States
282 U.S. 434 (Supreme Court, 1931)