Roy Thomas Conner v. United States

391 F.2d 926
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedAugust 30, 1968
Docket24938_1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 391 F.2d 926 (Roy Thomas Conner v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roy Thomas Conner v. United States, 391 F.2d 926 (5th Cir. 1968).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The appellant was found guilty by a jury of interstate transportation of a stolen motor vehicle in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 2312 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi. Accordingly, he was adjudged to be guilty and sentence was imposed. He was represented by court appointed counsel during his trial.

On this appeal it is contended that error was committed in permitting an incriminating statement made to an P.B.I. Agent to be admitted into evidence and in failing to grant a motion for a directed verdict of acquittal. It is further claimed that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict and judgment.

The record in this case shows no error. Quite to the contrary the record amply supports the verdict and judgment and clearly demonstrates that the appellant received a fair trial. Battles v. United States, 388 F.2d 799 (5 Cir. 1968—No. 24743); Stephens v. United States, 354 F.2d 999 (5 Cir. 1965); Garrison v. United States, 353 F.2d 94 (10 Cir. 1965); Rua v. United States, 321 F.2d 140 (5 Cir. 1963); Caster v. United States, 319 F.2d 850 (5 Cir. 1963); McFarland v. United States, 273 F.2d 417 (5 Cir. 1960).

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
391 F.2d 926, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roy-thomas-conner-v-united-states-ca5-1968.