Roy Salinas v. United States

424 F.2d 541, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9718
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 17, 1970
Docket28670_1
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 424 F.2d 541 (Roy Salinas v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roy Salinas v. United States, 424 F.2d 541, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9718 (5th Cir. 1970).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This appeal is taken from an order of the district court denying the motion of a federal convict to vacate sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. We affirm. 1

Appellant is currently serving an eight-year sentence for violating 26 U.S.C. § 4704(a), selling narcotic drugs (Heroin) not in the original stamped package, to which he pled guilty. In his § 2255 motion to vacate sentence, appellant contends that his guilty plea “was coerced by the then existing weight of authorities which held that the privilege against self-incrimination could not be asserted by those in [his] circumstances.” He urges that the reasoning in *542 Leary v. United States, 1969, 395 U.S. 6, 89 S.Ct. 1532, 23 L.Ed.2d 57, applies to his case, arguing that by being required to register and pay the tax he is being forced to incriminate himself for a state prosecution. The district court denied relief based upon this Court’s opinion in United States v. Walker, 5th Cir. 1969, 414 F.2d 876. For the reasons expressed in Walker, the judgment below is affirmed. See also Turner v. United States, 1970, 396 U.S. 398, 90 S.Ct. 642, 24 L.Ed.2d 610.

Affirmed.

1

. It is appropriate to dispose of this pro se case summarily, pursuant to this Court’s local Rule 9(c) (2), appellant having failed to file a brief within the time fixed by Rule 31, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Kimbrough v. Beto, Director, 5th Cir. 1969, 412 F.2d 981.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Riscard v. United States
355 F. Supp. 671 (D. Puerto Rico, 1972)
Joe Lee Baker v. United States
438 F.2d 129 (Fifth Circuit, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
424 F.2d 541, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9718, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roy-salinas-v-united-states-ca5-1970.