Roy M. Wahlgren v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Company
This text of 292 U.S. 639 (Roy M. Wahlgren v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
292 U.S. 639
54 S.Ct. 774
78 L.Ed. 1491
Roy M. WAHLGREN, petitioner,
v.
BAUSCH & LOMB OPTICAL COMPANY, et al.*
No. 942.
Supreme Court of the United States
May 7, 1934
Mr. Roy M. Wahlgren, pro se.
For opinion below, see 66 F.(2d) 660.
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is denied, for the reason that the Court, upon examination of the papers herein submitted, finds no ground upon which a writ of certiorari should be granted. The petition for writ of certiorari is, therefore, also denied.
Rehearing denied 292 U. S. 615, 54 S. Ct. 862, 78 L. Ed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
292 U.S. 639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roy-m-wahlgren-v-bausch-lomb-optical-company-scotus-1934.