Roy M. Cohn v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

410 F.2d 399, 23 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1520, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12280
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided May 22, 1969·No. 32618·Published

Opinion

410 F.2d 399

Roy M. COHN, Appellant,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Appellee.

No. 492.

Docket 32618.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued May 22, 1969.

Decided May 22, 1969.

John A. Santospirito, New York City (Saxe, Bacon & Bolan, New York City, on the brief), for appellant.

Loring W. Post, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (Johnnie M. Walters, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson and Meyer Rothwacks, Attys., Washington, D. C., on the brief), for appellee.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, FEINBERG, Circuit Judge, and TIMBERS, District Judge.*

PER CURIAM:

Taxpayer appeals from an unreported decision of the Tax Court, Arnold Raum, J., which held that the sum of $27,247 received by taxpayer in 1958 was compensation for services as a co-executor rather than a gift. The same issue on substantially the same evidence had been similarly decided in a suit for a refund on behalf of taxpayer's co-executor in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Frank v. United States, 260 F.Supp. 691 (S.D. N.Y.1966). We affirm on the opinion of the Tax Court.

Notes:

*

Chief Judge of the District of Connecticut, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roy M. Cohn v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 410 F.2d 399, 23 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1520, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12280 (2d Cir. 1969).

410 F.2d 399 (Roy M. Cohn v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Frank v. United States
260 F. Supp. 691 (S.D. New York, 1966)