Roy Lee Dimmick v. State of Alaska

460 F.2d 292, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9562
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMay 15, 1972
Docket72-1137
StatusPublished

This text of 460 F.2d 292 (Roy Lee Dimmick v. State of Alaska) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roy Lee Dimmick v. State of Alaska, 460 F.2d 292, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9562 (9th Cir. 1972).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Dimmick is an Alaska State prisoner. After exhausting his state remedies, he applied for habeas relief in the District Court. After conducting an evidentiary hearing, the District Court denied the sought relief, and Dimmick appeals.

*293 The only question presented is whether Dimmiek has such standing as to benefit from the alleged infringement of the constitutional rights of one who participated in the offense for which Dimmiek was convicted. Under the law of this Circuit, the question must be answered in the negative. See Byrd v. Comstock, 430 F.2d 937 (9th Cir. 1970). Cf. People v. Varnum, 66 Cal.2d 808, 59 Cal.Rptr. 108, 427 P.2d 772 (1967).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cleo F. Byrd v. Howard M. Comstock
430 F.2d 937 (Ninth Circuit, 1970)
People v. Varnum
427 P.2d 772 (California Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
460 F.2d 292, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roy-lee-dimmick-v-state-of-alaska-ca9-1972.