Roy L. Patterson v. Sam Austin
This text of 759 F.2d 817 (Roy L. Patterson v. Sam Austin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The court’s consideration of the respondent’s petition for rehearing en banc was postponed until a decision by the en banc court in Davis v. Kemp, 752 F.2d 1515 (11th Cir. En Banc 1985). In light of that decision and the opinion accompanying it, the petition for rehearing is DENIED and since no member of this panel nor other Judge in regular active service on the court requested that the court be polled on rehearing en banc (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Eleventh Circuit Rule 26), the Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
759 F.2d 817, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 30284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roy-l-patterson-v-sam-austin-ca11-1985.