Roy L. Patterson v. Sam Austin

759 F.2d 817, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 30284
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Roy L. Patterson v. Sam Austin. Read the opinion of the Court — 728 F.2d 1389
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided April 11, 1985·No. 82-8092·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The court’s consideration of the respondent’s petition for rehearing en banc was postponed until a decision by the en banc court in Davis v. Kemp, 752 F.2d 1515 (11th Cir. En Banc 1985). In light of that decision and the opinion accompanying it, the petition for rehearing is DENIED and since no member of this panel nor other Judge in regular active service on the court requested that the court be polled on rehearing en banc (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Eleventh Circuit Rule 26), the Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roy L. Patterson v. Sam Austin, 759 F.2d 817, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 30284 (11th Cir. 1985).

759 F.2d 817 (Roy L. Patterson v. Sam Austin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related