Roy L. English v. North Pacific Products, Inc.
This text of 559 F.2d 566 (Roy L. English v. North Pacific Products, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The trial judge, concluding that claims 1 and 4 of plaintiffs United States Patent No. 3,765,122 covering a “Flying Toy” were embodied in a flying ring toy manufactured and sold by defendant, but that those patent claims were obvious and hence invalid (35 U.S.C. §' 103), rendered judgment accordingly. Hence this appeal.
After examining the record and reviewing the pertinent law, we are clear that all material findings have support in the evidence and are not clearly erroneous, and that the judgment should be and is
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
559 F.2d 566, 200 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roy-l-english-v-north-pacific-products-inc-ca9-1977.