Roy G. Andersen and Nancy R. Andersen v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
This text of 341 F.2d 584 (Roy G. Andersen and Nancy R. Andersen v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The question is whether the findings of the Tax Court are clearly erroneous. We do not find them so.
Taxpayers assert that the Commissioner in the stipulation of facts prior to trial had stipulated that every statement in the attached exhibits was true. We do not so read the stipulation.
Taxpayers assert that the Commissioner, in opening statement, had so limited the issues as to preclude the Tax Court from deciding in this fashion. We do not so construe the statement when read in its entirety.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
341 F.2d 584, 15 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roy-g-andersen-and-nancy-r-andersen-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-ca9-1965.