Roy Anderson v. The United States

975 F.2d 868, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 16585, 1992 WL 158096
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedJuly 9, 1992
Docket92-5047
StatusUnpublished

This text of 975 F.2d 868 (Roy Anderson v. The United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roy Anderson v. The United States, 975 F.2d 868, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 16585, 1992 WL 158096 (Fed. Cir. 1992).

Opinion

975 F.2d 868

NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
Roy ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 92-5047.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 9, 1992.

On Appeal from the United States Claims Court in Case No(s). 91-1166C.

Cl.Ct.

AFFIRMED.

(NIES, Chief Judge, RICH, Circuit Judge, and RESTANI*, Judge ):

Judgment

PER CURIAM

AFFIRMED. See Fed.Cir.R. 36.

*

Honorable Jane A. Restani, U.S. Court of International Trade, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

P. Francini & Co. v. United States
30 Cont. Cas. Fed. 70,857 (Court of Claims, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
975 F.2d 868, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 16585, 1992 WL 158096, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roy-anderson-v-the-united-states-cafc-1992.