Roy Allen Stephens v. State of Florida
This text of Roy Allen Stephens v. State of Florida (Roy Allen Stephens v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2025-2317 _____________________________
ROY ALLEN STEPHENS,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamilton County. Jamie L. Tyndal, Judge.
January 28, 2026
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED. An order denying a request for extension of time to file a postconviction motion is nonfinal and not appealable. See Payton v. State, 58 So. 3d 933, 933 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011).
OSTERHAUS, C.J., and ROBERTS and BILBREY, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Roy Allen Stephens, pro se, Appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Amanda Bosman, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Roy Allen Stephens v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roy-allen-stephens-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2026.