Roy A. Lollie and Faye G. Lollie v. Brown Marine Service, Inc.
This text of 995 F.2d 1565 (Roy A. Lollie and Faye G. Lollie v. Brown Marine Service, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellants brought this personal injury action under the Jones Act and general maritime law. On appeal, they argue the district court erred in granting judgment on the pleadings to appellee on their claims for loss of consortium and society. Adopting the reasoning in Michel v. Total Transp., Inc., 957 F.2d 186, 191 (5th Cir.1992) and Murray v. Anthony J. Bertucci Constr. Co., 958 F.2d 127, 131-32 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 190, 121 L.Ed.2d 134 (1992), we hold that neither the Jones Act nor general maritime law authorizes recovery for loss of society or consortium in personal injury cases. The rest of appellants’ claims, which involve the district court’s jury charges, also lack merit.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
995 F.2d 1565, 1993 A.M.C. 2947, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 19188, 1993 WL 255219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roy-a-lollie-and-faye-g-lollie-v-brown-marine-service-inc-ca11-1993.