Roxanne R. v. Luis A.F.

88 A.D.3d 586, 931 N.Y.2d 495

Opinion

Family Court properly determined that freeing the child for [587]*587adoption by her foster parents was in her best interests (see Matter of Guinta v Doxtator, 20 AD3d 47, 53-55 [2005]). The standard for custody as between nonparents does not afford appellant a preference (Matter of Vanisha J. [Patricia J.], 87 AD3d 696 [2011]; Matter of Jennifer A., 225 AD2d 204, 206 [1996], lv denied 91 NY2d 809 [1998]). Nevertheless, we note that appellant is free to seek visitation (see Matter of Shelia B. v Shirelle Jasmine B., 67 AD3d 610 [2009]). Concur — Tom, J.E, Saxe, Moskowitz, DeGrasse and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roxanne R. v. Luis A.F., 88 A.D.3d 586, 931 N.Y.2d 495 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

88 A.D.3d 586 (Roxanne R. v. Luis A.F.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Guinta v. Doxtator
20 A.D.3d 47 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Shelia B. v. Jasmine B.
67 A.D.3d 610 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
In re Vanisha J.
87 A.D.3d 696 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
In re Jennifer A.
225 A.D.2d 204 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)