Roxanne Latiolais v. Hudson Insurance Company, Etal.

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedApril 30, 2015
DocketCW-0015-0300
StatusUnknown

This text of Roxanne Latiolais v. Hudson Insurance Company, Etal. (Roxanne Latiolais v. Hudson Insurance Company, Etal.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roxanne Latiolais v. Hudson Insurance Company, Etal., (La. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT

NO: CW 15-00300

Judgment rendered and mailed to all parties or counsel of record on April 8, 2015.

ROXANNE LATIOLAIS VERSUS HUDSON INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL.

FILED: 04/02/15

On application of Roxanne Latiolais for Supervisory Writ in No. 2011-4809 on the docket of the Fifteenth Judicial District Court, Parish of Lafayette, Honorable Michelle M. Breaux.

Counsel for: James Christian Lewis Roxanne Latiolais

Counsel for: John Patrick Guillory Acme Truck Line, Inc. Hudson Insurance Company John Mhire

Counsel for: Sidney Wallis Degan, III Gemini Insurance Company Foster P. Nash, III Philip Charles Brickman

Counsel for: David Thomas Butler, Jr. LUBA Insurance Company

Lake Charles, Louisiana, on April 8, 2015.

STAY DENIED. WRIT GRANTED IN PART AND MADE PEREMPTORY; WRIT DENIED IN PART. We find that the trial court erred in ordering the plaintiff to undergo a functional capacity evaluation (FCE) by Samuel Forester, a physical therapist. A physical therapist is not one of the professionals permitted to conduct examinations pursuant to La.Code Civ.P. art. 1464. See Williams v. Smith, 576 So.2d 448 (La.1991)(limiting examinations to those professionals specifically set forth in Article 1464). Therefore, we hereby reverse the trial court’s ruling ordering the FCE. As this court orders that the FCE be set aside, we decline to issue a ruling regarding the issue of whether good cause has been shown for an FCE.

_____________________ _____________________ _____________________ JCP JTG JEC

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. Smith
576 So. 2d 448 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Roxanne Latiolais v. Hudson Insurance Company, Etal., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roxanne-latiolais-v-hudson-insurance-company-etal-lactapp-2015.