Roxana Juana Rodrigo Ramirez v. Itzel Torres, as Independent Administrator of the Estate of Jose L. Torres
This text of Roxana Juana Rodrigo Ramirez v. Itzel Torres, as Independent Administrator of the Estate of Jose L. Torres (Roxana Juana Rodrigo Ramirez v. Itzel Torres, as Independent Administrator of the Estate of Jose L. Torres) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued May 29, 2025
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00671-CV ——————————— ROXANA JUANA RODRIGO RAMIREZ, Appellant V. ITZEL TORRES, AS INDEPENDENT ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF JOSE L. TORRES, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 1 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 1229797
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Roxana Juana Rodrigo Ramirez, has filed a notice of appeal from
the trial court’s final judgment signed on August 27, 2024. Appellant has failed to
timely file a brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a) (governing time to file brief). On October 25, 2024, the clerk’s record was filed, and on January 18, 2025,
the court reporter’s record was filed. Accordingly, appellant’s brief was due to be
filed on or before February 20, 2025. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). Appellant did not
file an appellant’s brief.
On February 26, 2025, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that this
appeal was subject to dismissal unless a brief, or a motion to extend time to file a
brief, was filed within ten days of the notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a) (governing
failure of appellant to file brief), 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary dismissal of appeal
for want of prosecution), 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case for failure
to comply with notice from Clerk of Court). Despite the notice that this appeal was
subject to dismissal, appellant did not respond to the February 26, 2025 notice.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 42.3(b), 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Guerra, Caughey, and Morgan.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Roxana Juana Rodrigo Ramirez v. Itzel Torres, as Independent Administrator of the Estate of Jose L. Torres, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roxana-juana-rodrigo-ramirez-v-itzel-torres-as-independent-administrator-texapp-2025.