Rowson's Estate

34 A. 433, 175 Pa. 150, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1226
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 13, 1896
DocketAppeal, No. 397
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 34 A. 433 (Rowson's Estate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rowson's Estate, 34 A. 433, 175 Pa. 150, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1226 (Pa. 1896).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

In this application for an appeal from the decision of the register of wills, admitting to probate, as the last will of William Rowson, deceased, a certain paper writing, etc., the learned auditing judge awarded an issue devisavit vel non to determine the following questions of fact:

First. Whether the signature to said paper writing is the signature of the said William Rowson.

[155]*155Second. Whether the said William Rowson was at the time of the execution of said instrument of sound disposing mind, memory and understanding, and of sufficient mental capacity to make a valid will and testament.

Third. Whether the said William Rowson was induced to make said paper writing by undue influence of Thomas Arthur Rowson and others. And why said probate should not be set aside and the letters testamentary granted to Thomas Arthur Rowson, as executor thereof, be revoked.

Exceptions to the adjudication having been filed, the court in bane, after carefully considering the testimony on which the issue was awarded, came to the conclusion that the evidence was not of such a character as would justify a trial judge in sustaining a verdict against the will. The exceptions were therefore sustained and the decree awarding an issue vacated. Hence this appeal.

Without • attempting to summarize the testimony adduced before the auditing judge, or undertaking to notice at length the nature and character thereof, as is done in the opinion of the orphans’ court, our consideration of the evidence, properly bearing on the questions involved, has satisfied us that the conclusion reached by the court is correct, and that its decree should be sustained.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed, with costs to be paid by the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Bryant
191 So. 2d 747 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 A. 433, 175 Pa. 150, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rowsons-estate-pa-1896.