Rowley v. James

Illinois Supreme Court

Rowley v. James

31 Ill. 298

CourtIllinois Supreme Court

DecidedApril 15, 1863

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 31 Ill. 298 (Rowley v. James) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rowley v. James, 31 Ill. 298 (Ill. 1863).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Cat oh

delivered the opinion of the Court.

A.11 of the errors are well assigned in this case. Neither the petition, nor the proof, makes out a lien under the statute of 1845, which controls this contract. No time was specified for the completion of the work, or the payment of the money. Indeed, the petition is upon an implied contract. We have so often decided these questions that their further consideration is unnecessary.

The decree is reversed, and the suit remanded.

Decree reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Chief Justice Cat oh

delivered the opinion of the Court.

A.11 of the errors are well assigned in this case. Neither the petition, nor the proof, makes out a lien under the statute of 1845, which controls this contract. No time was specified for the completion of the work, or the payment of the money. Indeed, the petition is upon an implied contract. We have so often decided these questions that their further consideration is unnecessary.

The decree is reversed, and the suit remanded.

Decree reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 Ill. 298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rowley-v-james-ill-1863.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack