Rowley v. Doe e. d. Carpenter

Indiana Supreme Court

Rowley v. Doe e. d. Carpenter

1 Smith & H. 335

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 15, 1849

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 Smith & H. 335 (Rowley v. Doe e. d. Carpenter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rowley v. Doe e. d. Carpenter, 1 Smith & H. 335 (Ind. 1849).

Pincite

Opinion

Smith, J.

— “ The Court below appears to have held upon the trial that the Enlargement was intended to correspond with the original plan of the city, as to the size of the blocks, notwithstanding the specification in the videlicet, that they are to be eighteen poles square. From an examination of both plats and the specifications accompanying them, we think it may be fairly inferred that such wap the intention of the proprietor, and as the Court below has so determined, we shall not disturb the judgment.”

Judgment affirmed, &c.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith, J.

— “ The Court below appears to have held upon the trial that the Enlargement was intended to correspond with the original plan of the city, as to the size of the blocks, notwithstanding the specification in the videlicet, that they are to be eighteen poles square. From an examination of both plats and the specifications accompanying them, we think it may be fairly inferred that such wap the intention of the proprietor, and as the Court below has so determined, we shall not disturb the judgment.”

Judgment affirmed, &c.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Smith & H. 335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rowley-v-doe-e-d-carpenter-ind-1849.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack