Rowley v. City of North Myrtle Beach

258 F. App'x 546
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rowley v. City of North Myrtle Beach. Read the opinion of the Court — 356 F. App'x 657
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 18, 2007·No. No. 07-1906·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Joyce E. Rowley seeks to appeal the district court order consolidating her two cases and denying as moot several pending motions. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Rowley seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny Rowley’s motion for stay of proceedings and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rowley v. City of North Myrtle Beach, 258 F. App'x 546 (4th Cir. 2007).

258 F. App'x 546 (Rowley v. City of North Myrtle Beach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)