Rowley v. Brown

1 Binn. 61, 1803 Pa. LEXIS 15
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 19, 1803·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It is the rule of this court to disallow in every case a lumping sale by the sheriff where from the distinctness of the items of property he can make distinct sales. It is essential to justice and to the protection of unfortunate debtors that this should be the general rule; any other would lead to the most shameful sacrifices of property. There may be exceptions, but the purchaser must bring himself within them. The present case is not one; the tenements and lots vtere here sufficiently distinct both in law and fact, and there was no reason for deviating from the common practice.

Rule absolute.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rowley v. Brown, 1 Binn. 61, 1803 Pa. LEXIS 15 (Pa. 1803).

1 Binn. 61 (Rowley v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Grim v. Reinbold
23 A. 1129 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1892)
Klopp v. Witmoyer
43 Pa. 219 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1861)
Day v. Graham
6 Ill. 435 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1844)