Rowles v. State
This text of 954 So. 2d 1278 (Rowles v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Robert Lee ROWLES, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Rose M. Levering, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We conclude that the preserved issues raised in this appeal are controlled by this *1279 court's prior decisions in State v. Ducharme, 892 So.2d 1133 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004), and Moore v. State, 909 So.2d 500 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005), and, accordingly, we affirm.
AFFIRMED.
GRIFFIN, THOMPSON and MONACO, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
954 So. 2d 1278, 2007 WL 1295752, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rowles-v-state-fladistctapp-2007.