Rowland's Heirs v. Cock's Administrator

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Rowland's Heirs v. Cock's Administrator

24 Ky. 453

DecidedJune 11, 1829

StatusPublished

This text of 24 Ky. 453 (Rowland's Heirs v. Cock's Administrator) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rowland's Heirs v. Cock's Administrator, 24 Ky. 453 (Ky. Ct. App. 1829).

Pincite

Opinion

Judge Robertson

delivered the opinion of the Court.

■ Thjs is a scire facias to revive a judgment at law. Several errors are assigned to the judgment for execution, which Cock’s administrator obtained. Bat there is only one which is deemed sufficient for the reversal of the judgment,

The scire facias represents one of Rowland’s heirs|to be an infant. There was no appearance, nor was a' guardian ad litem appointed for the infant. The judginent was by default. Jn this there was error.

And, therefore, the judgment is reversed, and .the cause remanded for proceedings conformable to this opinion. ’

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judge Robertson

delivered the opinion of the Court.

■ Thjs is a scire facias to revive a judgment at law. Several errors are assigned to the judgment for execution, which Cock’s administrator obtained. Bat there is only one which is deemed sufficient for the reversal of the judgment,

The scire facias represents one of Rowland’s heirs|to be an infant. There was no appearance, nor was a' guardian ad litem appointed for the infant. The judginent was by default. Jn this there was error.

And, therefore, the judgment is reversed, and .the cause remanded for proceedings conformable to this opinion. ’

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 Ky. 453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rowlands-heirs-v-cocks-administrator-kyctapp-1829.