Rowland v. WASHTENAW COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION
This text of 711 N.W.2d 376 (Rowland v. WASHTENAW COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Joanne ROWLAND, a/k/a Joan Rowland, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
WASHTENAW COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 13, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall include among the issues addressed: (1) whether appellant's proposed overruling of Hobbs v. Michigan State Highway Dep't, 398 Mich. 90, 96, 247 N.W.2d 754 (1976), and Brown v. Manistee Co. Rd. Comm., 452 Mich. 354, 356-357, 550 N.W.2d 215 (1996), is justified under the standard for applying stare decisis discussed in Robinson v. City of Detroit, 462 Mich. 439, 463-468, 613 N.W.2d 307 (2000); and (2) if so, whether a decision overruling Hobbs and Brown should have retroactive or prospective application under the standard discussed in Pohutski v. City of Allen Park, 465 Mich. 675, 695-699, 641 N.W.2d 219 (2002).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
711 N.W.2d 376, 474 Mich. 1099, 2006 Mich. LEXIS 614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rowland-v-washtenaw-county-road-commission-mich-2006.