Rowland v. STB

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 24, 1996·No. 95-60489·Unpublished

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________

No. 95-60489 _______________________

BRAD ROWLAND; JONES COUNTY GRAIN,

Petitioners,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD,

Respondents,

LONE STAR RAILROAD, INC.; SOUTHERN SWITCHING COMPANY

Intervenors.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (AB-425) _________________________________________________________________ April 17, 1996

Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The court has carefully considered petitioners’ challenge to

the ICC abandonment order in light of their oral argument, briefs and

pertinent portions of the record. Having done so, we cannot conclude

that the ICC order was arbitrary and capricious or not in accord with

the law, nor were the commission procedures unfair or inadequate.

Petition for review DENIED.

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rowland v. STB, (5th Cir. 1996).

Rowland v. STB (Rowland v. STB) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.