Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Rowland v. State

Rowland v. State

148 S.E. 298, 39 Ga. App. 669, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 497
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 14, 1929
Docket19596
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 148 S.E. 298 (Rowland v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rowland v. State, 148 S.E. 298, 39 Ga. App. 669, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 497 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).

Opinion

Luke, J.

The alleged newly discovered evidence is merely cumulative and impeaching in its character, and, in addition thereto, the witnesses who purport to give the new and additional testimony were accessible and known to Rowland before and at the trial. The court properly overruled the extraordinary motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. William B. Eenl, for plaintiff in error. W. B. Gills, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gaulden v. State
154 S.E. 209 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
148 S.E. 298, 39 Ga. App. 669, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rowland-v-state-gactapp-1929.