Rowland v. Rowland
This text of 27 N.Y.S. 606 (Rowland v. Rowland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The complaint states a good cause of action at law, and erroneously prays judgment for an accounting. The answer states that plaintiff was never a partner in defendant’s business, but was an employe upon a salary, the amount of which was to be determined by the profits of the business. The answer is thus consistent with the allegations of the complaint. Both the complaint and answer show a proper case for a reference. The defenses of payment and release will not, in the ordinary course, be put in evidence until the plaintiff has established his cause of action, to do which he requires a trial before a referee. Order affirmed, with $10 costs to abide the event. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
27 N.Y.S. 606, 75 Hun 585, 82 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 585, 57 N.Y. St. Rep. 652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rowland-v-rowland-nysupct-1894.