Rowland v. Mayor of New York
This text of 12 Jones & S. 559 (Rowland v. Mayor of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
wrote as follows :—The main question involved has been decided by the court of appeals in Sweeny v. Mayor, &c. (58 N. Y. 625 ; affi’g 5 Daly, 274), and that decision is fatal to plaintiff’s claim. It is an express decision of the question before us, and as such it has never been modified or questioned. The mere fact, therefore, that the reasoning of a few later cases, involving somewhat similar, but really different questions, seems to indicate a change of views, affords no justification for this court for a departure from it.
The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
Speir, J., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
12 Jones & S. 559, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rowland-v-mayor-of-new-york-nysuperctnyc-1878.