Rowland Martin, Jr. v. Edward Bravenec, and the Law Office of McKnight and Bravenec

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 1, 2014
Docket04-14-00483-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Rowland Martin, Jr. v. Edward Bravenec, and the Law Office of McKnight and Bravenec (Rowland Martin, Jr. v. Edward Bravenec, and the Law Office of McKnight and Bravenec) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rowland Martin, Jr. v. Edward Bravenec, and the Law Office of McKnight and Bravenec, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-14-00483-CV

Rowland MARTIN, Jr., Appellant

v. Edward BRAVENEC and Law Office and Edward BRAVENEC and The Law Office of McKnight and Bravenec, Appellees

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2014-CI-07644 Honorable Dick Alcala, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 1, 2014

DISMISSED

After this appeal was abated to the trial court to consider an affidavit of indigence filed by

appellant in this appeal, the trial court entered an order granting the contests to appellant’s affidavit

and finding that the appellant is not indigent. On August 26, 2014, appellant filed a third

supplemental notice of appeal which this court construed as a motion for review. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 20.1(j)(1). By order dated August 27, 2014, this court denied appellant’s motion for review and

ordered appellant to file written proof by September 19, 2014, establishing that he had paid or

made arrangements to pay the fees for the preparation of the clerk’s record and reporter’s record 04-14-00483-CV

for this appeal. Our order stated that if appellant failed to file written proof within the time

provided, this appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b),

42.3(b).

On September 18, 2014, appellant filed a “Motion to Rehear in Part and to Abate in Part

Pursuant to the Texas Citizen’s Participation Act.” Appellant’s motion is denied. Because

appellant failed to file written proof of record payment in accordance with this court’s prior order,

this appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b-c).

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Rowland Martin, Jr. v. Edward Bravenec, and the Law Office of McKnight and Bravenec, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rowland-martin-jr-v-edward-bravenec-and-the-law-of-texapp-2014.