Rowell v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Rowell v. State

430 S.W.3d 334, 2014 WL 1847903, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 516

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 6, 2014·No. No. ED 100217·Published

Opinion

[335] ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Mario Rowell, appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for postcon-viction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the motion court’s judgment denying the movant’s Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[335] ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Mario Rowell, appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for postcon-viction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the motion court’s judgment denying the movant’s Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Rowell v. State, 430 S.W.3d 334, 2014 WL 1847903, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 516 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

430 S.W.3d 334 (Rowell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.