Rowell v. State

160 So. 3d 950, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 5194, 2015 WL 1609926
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 10, 2015
DocketNo. 5D14-3782
StatusPublished

This text of 160 So. 3d 950 (Rowell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rowell v. State, 160 So. 3d 950, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 5194, 2015 WL 1609926 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

WALLIS, J.

Appellant appeals the trial court’s summary denial of his Rule 3.800(a) Motion to Correct Illegal Sentence. The sole issue is whether the trial judge, after finding that Appellant violated his probation, erred by subsequently revoking Appellant’s Youthful Offender status. We find that Rule 3.800(a) is the proper avenue for Appellant to pursue review of the revocation. Blacker v. State, 49 So.3d 785 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). We note that the order on appeal is silent as to the issue of the revocation of the Youthful Offender designation. We remand for the trial court to address this specific claim.

REVERSED and REMANDED with INSTRUCTIONS.

SAWAYA and PALMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blacker v. State
49 So. 3d 785 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
160 So. 3d 950, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 5194, 2015 WL 1609926, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rowell-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.