Rowell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Rowell v. State

666 So. 2d 832, 1995 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 223, 1995 WL 358921

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

DecidedJune 16, 1995

DocketCR-90-1669

StatusPublished

This text of 666 So. 2d 832 (Rowell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rowell v. State, 666 So. 2d 832, 1995 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 223, 1995 WL 358921 (Ala. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

After Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

McMILLAN, Judge.

The Alabama Supreme Court reversed the judgment, holding that the evidence regarding a large sum of money and a telephone [833]*833pager was properly admitted to prove the appellant’s constructive possession of cocaine.

Because the appellant raised no other issues on appeal, we affirm the judgment of the trial court on the authority of Rowell v. State, 666 So.2d 830 (Ala.1995).

AFFIRMED.

All judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI