Rowell v. State
666 So. 2d 832, 1995 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 223, 1995 WL 358921
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rowell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 666 So. 2d 825 →
Opinion
After Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court
The Alabama Supreme Court reversed the judgment, holding that the evidence regarding a large sum of money and a telephone [833] pager was properly admitted to prove the appellant’s constructive possession of cocaine.
Because the appellant raised no other issues on appeal, we affirm the judgment of the trial court on the authority of Rowell v. State, 666 So.2d 830 (Ala.1995).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rowell v. State, 666 So. 2d 832, 1995 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 223, 1995 WL 358921 (Ala. Ct. App. 1995).
666 So. 2d 832 (Rowell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rowell v. State
666 So. 2d 830 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1995)