Rowell v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Rowell v. State

52 So. 310, 166 Ala. 44, 1910 Ala. LEXIS 342

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedApril 7, 1910

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 52 So. 310 (Rowell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rowell v. State, 52 So. 310, 166 Ala. 44, 1910 Ala. LEXIS 342 (Ala. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

DOWDELL, C. J.

It appears from the record that the present appeal ivas not taken until after the expiration of a year from the rendition of the judgment. The time within which an appeal can be taken in such a case is limited by the statute to one year. The appeal is therefore unauthorized, and this court is without jurisdiction to entertain it.—Dennis et al v. Currie, 142 Ala. 637, 38 South. 802; Blackburn v. Huber Mfg. Co., 135 Ala. 598, 33 South. 160. It follows that the appeal must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Anderson, Mayfield, and Sayre, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DOWDELL, C. J.

It appears from the record that the present appeal ivas not taken until after the expiration of a year from the rendition of the judgment. The time within which an appeal can be taken in such a case is limited by the statute to one year. The appeal is therefore unauthorized, and this court is without jurisdiction to entertain it.—Dennis et al v. Currie, 142 Ala. 637, 38 South. 802; Blackburn v. Huber Mfg. Co., 135 Ala. 598, 33 South. 160. It follows that the appeal must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Anderson, Mayfield, and Sayre, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 So. 310, 166 Ala. 44, 1910 Ala. LEXIS 342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rowell-v-state-ala-1910.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack