Rowell v. Freese

23 Me. 182
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJune 15, 1843
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 23 Me. 182 (Rowell v. Freese) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rowell v. Freese, 23 Me. 182 (Me. 1843).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was by

Whitman C. J.

This is a bill in equity. The defendant demurs to it, alleging that it contains no such facts as would authorize this Court, as a Court of equity, to take cognizance of it. On looking into the bill we find an allegation, that the defendant received a conveyance of an estate, therein described, in trust; and this Court has cognizance of trusts. But we think, that the bill should have stated something more ; it should appear that the conveyance was made in trust expressly; or by implication ; and, if by implication, such facts should be stated as would clearly show it to be such. It should appear either, that the whole consideration for the conveyance came from the plaintiffs; or that the plaintiffs had an equitable right to have the conveyance made to them ; and that the defendant well knew it; but that he, nevertheless, fraudulently procured it to be made to himself; or some other ground, from which a Court could be authorized to infer an implied, resulting, or constructive trust. The bill does not present any such case ; and therefore must be adjudged insufficient, and be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hall v. Congdon
55 N.H. 104 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1874)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 Me. 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rowell-v-freese-me-1843.