Rowell v. Clark County Public Defender's Office

543 U.S. 802, 125 S. Ct. 188, 160 L. Ed. 2d 3, 73 U.S.L.W. 3215, 2004 U.S. LEXIS 6248
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 4, 2004
Docket03-10993
StatusPublished

This text of 543 U.S. 802 (Rowell v. Clark County Public Defender's Office) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rowell v. Clark County Public Defender's Office, 543 U.S. 802, 125 S. Ct. 188, 160 L. Ed. 2d 3, 73 U.S.L.W. 3215, 2004 U.S. LEXIS 6248 (2004).

Opinion

Sup. Ct. Nev. Motion of petitioner for leave *803 to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).

Justice Stevens dissents.

See id., at 4, and cases cited therein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals
506 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
543 U.S. 802, 125 S. Ct. 188, 160 L. Ed. 2d 3, 73 U.S.L.W. 3215, 2004 U.S. LEXIS 6248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rowell-v-clark-county-public-defenders-office-scotus-2004.