ROWE, WENDI v. NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF CHILDREN
This text of ROWE, WENDI v. NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF CHILDREN (ROWE, WENDI v. NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF CHILDREN) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
1455 TP 11-01317 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND SCONIERS, JJ.
IN THE MATTER OF WENDI ROWE AND DOUGLAS GROOMS, PETITIONERS,
V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES AND CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, RESPONDENTS.
ERICKSON WEBB SCOLTON & HAJDU, LAKEWOOD (PAUL V. WEBB, III, OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONERS.
JULIE B. HEWITT, MAYVILLE, FOR RESPONDENT CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES.
ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (JULIE M. SHERIDAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Chautauqua County [James H. Dillon, J.], entered August 4, 2010) to review a determination of respondent New York State Office of Children and Family Services. The determination denied petitioners’ request that reports maintained in the New York State Central Register of Child Abuse and Maltreatment, indicating petitioners for maltreatment, be amended to unfounded and sealed.
It is hereby ORDERED that the determination is unanimously confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed.
Memorandum: Petitioners commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul the determination of respondent New York State Office of Children and Family Services denying their request to amend an indicated report of maltreatment to provide instead that the report was unfounded (see Social Services Law § 422 [8] [a] [v]; [c] [ii]). “Upon our review of the record, we conclude that there is a rational basis for the agency’s determination and that it is supported by substantial evidence” (Matter of Draman v New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs., 78 AD3d 1603, 1603-1604; see Matter of -2- 1455 TP 11-01317
Theresa G. v Johnson, 26 AD3d 726).
Entered: December 30, 2011 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ROWE, WENDI v. NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF CHILDREN, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rowe-wendi-v-new-york-state-office-of-children-nyappdiv-2011.