Rowe v. Tri-State Clinic, Inc.

43 Va. Cir. 27, 1997 Va. Cir. LEXIS 320
CourtBuchanan County Circuit Court
DecidedApril 1, 1997
DocketCase No. (Law) 364-94
StatusPublished

This text of 43 Va. Cir. 27 (Rowe v. Tri-State Clinic, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Buchanan County Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rowe v. Tri-State Clinic, Inc., 43 Va. Cir. 27, 1997 Va. Cir. LEXIS 320 (Va. Super. Ct. 1997).

Opinion

By Judge Keary R. Williams

This Court has now considered Defendant’s Motion to preclude Plaintiff submitting damages to die jury regarding any medical bills and amounts which have been forgiven or written off by the health care provider. The Court has further considered argument of counsel on March 27,1997, and the authorities cited, as well as the Opinion and Order from the Circuit Court of Spotsylvania County in Robin E. Comley v. Anthony R. Shepherd, 41 Va. Cir. 372 (1997), and would grant defense counsel’s Motion that any forgiven or written off portion of medical bills or expenses cannot be introduced as evidence of damage at the trial of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Comley v. Shepard
41 Va. Cir. 372 (Spotsylvania County Circuit Court, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
43 Va. Cir. 27, 1997 Va. Cir. LEXIS 320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rowe-v-tri-state-clinic-inc-vaccbuchanan-1997.