Rowe v. Superintendant Merr
This text of Rowe v. Superintendant Merr (Rowe v. Superintendant Merr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit
No. 99-1611
DAVID B. ROWE,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
SUPERINTENDENT, MERRIMACK COUNTY JAIL,
Defendant, Appellee.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
[Hon. Steven J. McAuliffe, U.S. District Judge]
Before
Lynch, Circuit Judge, Bownes, Senior Circuit Judge, and Lipez, Circuit Judge.
David B. Rowe on brief pro se. Donald E. Gardner and Devine, Millimet & Branch on brief for appellee.
March 31, 2000 Per Curiam. David B. Rowe appeals the district
court judgment granting the defendant's motion for summary
judgment. Upon de novo review, see Anderson v. Angelone,
123 F.3d 1197, 1198 (9th Cir. 1997), we affirm the judgment
below, essentially for the reasons stated in the district
court's order, dated April 13, 1999. We add only that the
district court did not abuse its discretion in denying
Rowe's motion for appointment of counsel and in granting
defendant an extension of time in which to file her motion
for summary judgment.
Affirmed. [NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]
Lynch, Circuit Judge, Bownes, Senior Circuit Judge, and Lipez, Circuit Judge.
David B. Rowe on brief pro se. Donald E. Gardner and Devine, Millimet & Branch on brief for appellee.
March 31, 2000 Per Curiam. David B. Rowe appeals the district
court judgment granting the defendant's motion for summary
court's order, dated April 13, 1999. We add only that the
Rowe's motion for appointment of counsel and in granting
Lynch, Circuit Judge, Bownes, Senior Circuit Judge, and Lipez, Circuit Judge.
David B. Rowe on brief pro se. Donald E. Gardner and Devine, Millimet & Branch on brief for appellee.
March 31, 2000 Per Curiam. David B. Rowe appeals the district
court judgment granting the defendant's motion for summary
court's order, dated April 13, 1999. We add only that the
Rowe's motion for appointment of counsel and in granting
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rowe v. Superintendant Merr, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rowe-v-superintendant-merr-ca1-2000.